I love this one from Infowars:
She makes a great point, actually…. buuuuut… science by definition must be falsifiable – i.e., you have to be able to disprove it.
So what exactly WOULD disprove “Global Warming”?
Well… NOTHING WOULD!
And that’s why, Rachel, “Global Warming” is NOT science!
3 Comments
HH
18 Mar 2011 - 5:23 pmYour understanding of Popper’s philosophy is incredibly poor. And regardless, climate change is falsifiable. I recommend not acquiring talking points regarding science from libertarian activist channels.
Lisa
1 Apr 2011 - 9:15 pmWell, asserting and making an argument are two different things. Perhaps you should not take your talking points from climate activist channels. LMAO.
audi
31 May 2011 - 8:59 amScience is fallible. But that does not mean it HAS to be fallible.
Gravity is infallible. But scientist were only able to get there through the infallibility of the scientific method.